
This is just a quick drawing showing what i mean.
Sensor dish:

This is a simple drawing showing what it would be like.
Its over 2 and a half meters high from the base of the dish to the top.
Author
Topic: C.E.C SU-43 (Read 2308 times)











***




That would make this system extremely inaccurate. The ship would have to manoeuvre into a geostationary orbit and it would have to compensate any inaccuracy by manoeuvring with the whole mass of the ship as an inertia inaccuracy factor.
Why not use a system with limited freedom of movement? Even the ability to turn no more than 10-20° would make it much more useful for planetary scans. Another option worth consideration would be a deployable satellite. A satellite would use a fixed array as well, yet it could arrange and aim itself with much more precision and it would hardly take up much more space than the current set-up. In addition, such a satellite could easily be mounted in a way that would retain the option to use it while it is docked with the ship in a way similar to what you got right now.







I've been thinking about this ship for a while now. What exactly is the ship's purpose? Sure, something archaeological. But what exactly? I'm just asking because I feel that whatever it is supposed to do exactly, it would not be able to do so in it's current layout. At least I could no think of anything.
For orbital archaeological survey it does not need any kind of lab equipment, but as many probes and satellites as possible and a wide range of optical and gravimetric sensors.
For anything involving lab equipment, it would need a lot of additional equipment that it cannot field as it is now. Ground survey equipment, ground transportation and digging equipment just to name a few. For that it lacks cargo capacity.
Recovery is not an option anyway, as the ship is not able to carry more than a few shards and splinters of anything.
So one way or another, the only thing it could actually do more or less is basic surface survey with an emphasis on basic. Squeezing in the equipment essential for anything beyond that will be quite a challenge.




I hope you don't take any of this for negative feedback, because it is most definitely not meant to be.As for negative feedback, what you have written falls well within the confines of constructive criticism, which is always welcome.











